compounding frequency; the same rate quoted two ways
APR and APY differ because one ignores compounding and the other includes it; the gap widens as compounding happens more often within the year, which is exactly why the label matters.
APR, or Annual Percentage Rate, is a nominal rate: the stated interest charged over a year, with no assumption about how often interest is added back to the balance. APY, or Annual Percentage Yield, is the effective annual rate, the percentage the balance actually grows after compounding is applied. The relationship between them is captured by one formula:
APY = (1 + APR / n)n − 1
where n is the number of compounding periods per year. When n equals 1, the two numbers are identical. As n climbs, the APY rises above the APR, and the difference grows with the size of the rate itself.
Take an account advertising 12% and ask what one dollar becomes after one year under different compounding schedules:
On the borrowing side, a credit card at 20% APR compounded daily produces an effective annual rate of roughly 22.1%, several points above the number printed on the monthly statement.
Many borrowers assume that the APR in a loan disclosure already reflects the true yearly cost of borrowing. It does not. APR folds in certain upfront charges such as origination fees and discount points, but it still treats interest as if it accrues only at year-end. On a long-term installment loan with monthly compounding, the effective cost paid each year can sit noticeably above the disclosed APR. APR is honest about fees, but quiet about in-year compounding.
The APR-versus-APY distinction assumes interest can compound inside the year. Loans calculated on simple interest, where interest is computed on the original principal and never added back to the balance, do not produce a gap at all. Zero-interest promotional financing may also carry an APR that exists only as a regulatory placeholder rather than a real cost. And outside the United States, the term APR sometimes already means what Americans call APY, so cross-border comparisons require reading the fine print rather than the headline number.
The practical rule is what the video closed on: convert both sides of any comparison to the same effective annual figure before deciding. The label is marketing. The compounding is the price.