Skip to content

Chapter 4 of 7

Words That Cut: Criticism, Satire, and Praise

Criticism has many tones, and English has a word for almost every shade. A diatribe is a forceful, bitter verbal attack; invective is harsh, insulting language directed at someone; a harangue is a long, aggressive speech that no one asked for. Together they describe the rhetoric of blame, delivered at volume. Castigation is severe reprimand from a coach or superior, and denigration is unfair belittling of a rival. The rancorous divorce that drags on for years lives on this kind of language. The common thread is that each word describes language designed to wound rather than to clarify. To castigate is to reprimand severely, while impugning is to dispute the validity or honesty of what someone has said. Some criticism aims higher, fomenting unrest among workers or otherwise stirring up the public mood.

Not all critical words involve outright attack. Facetious remarks treat serious issues with inappropriate humor, often at the worst possible moment. Fatuous comments are silly in a self-satisfied way, and fallacious claims rest on mistaken beliefs that masquerade as logic. Banal and hackneyed phrases are overused and lacking in originality, while a platitude offers trite wisdom that sounds wise but adds nothing. Derivative albums borrow without inventing, while convoluted plots confuse without enlightening. Cursory glances miss important errors. Behind these words sits a shared suspicion: that language can grow lazy and decorative rather than truthful.

Praise has its own vocabulary, often with a hint of warning. To extol or to laud is to praise enthusiastically; to venerate is to regard with great reverence; approbation is the formal nod of approval. Fervent supporters remain passionate through setbacks. Yet excessive praise tips into bombast, and ostentatious or pretentious displays of admiration try too hard to impress. Pedantic speakers are so eager to instruct that they grow tiresome, while acerbic critics cut sharply without becoming cruel. A zealot may take even mild criticism as a personal attack; a fanatic's fervor can be a kind of unintentional self-praise. A documentary that garners widespread praise, however, demonstrates that thoughtful speech can win approbation without falling into bombast. The English vocabulary reminds us that praise can flatter as dishonestly as criticism can wound, and the perspicacious reader learns to weigh both.

All chapters
  1. 1Voices and Silences: The Spectrum of Speech
  2. 2The Social Animal: Personality in Action
  3. 3Flattery, Deception, and Trust
  4. 4Words That Cut: Criticism, Satire, and Praise
  5. 5The Mind at Work: Knowledge, Thought, and Discovery
  6. 6Time's Footprint: Change, Motion, and Endurance
  7. 7Quantity, Variety, and Extremes

Drill it

Reading is not remembering. These come from the Gre Vocabulary deck:

Q

Abscond (v.)

To leave quickly and secretly, often to avoid detection.Example: The treasurer absconded with the club's funds before anyone noticed.

Q

Garrulous (adj.)

Excessively talkative, especially about trivial matters.Example: The garrulous cab driver talked nonstop for the entire ride.

Q

Laconic (adj.)

Using very few words; concise to the point of terseness.Example: His laconic reply gave no hint of his true feelings.

Q

Obfuscate (v.)

To deliberately make something unclear or confusing.Example: The lawyer's jargon seemed designed to obfuscate the contract's true meaning.