Skip to content

Chapter 2 of 7

Deontology and Kantian Ethics

Deontology is the ethical tradition that judges the morality of actions based on their adherence to rules, duties, or obligations rather than their consequences. Its most prominent philosopher is Immanuel Kant, whose Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) established the foundations of modern duty-based ethics. Kant's project was to discover a supreme moral principle that could be binding on all rational agents regardless of their personal desires or circumstances. This led him to distinguish between hypothetical imperatives, which are conditional commands of the form "if you want X, do Y," and categorical imperatives, which are unconditional demands that command action regardless of any personal inclination.

The categorical imperative is Kant's central moral principle, expressed through several formulations. The first, the Formula of Universal Law, instructs agents to act only according to maxims that they could will to become universal laws without contradiction. The second, the Formula of Humanity, requires that we treat humanity, whether in our own person or in that of another, always as an end and never merely as a means. The third, the Formula of the Kingdom of Ends, calls on us to act as if we were legislating members of a moral community in which all rational beings are simultaneously lawmakers and subjects of the law. Together, these formulations emphasize the dignity of rational agency and the universalizability of moral reasoning.

Central to Kant's framework is the concept of the good will, which he regards as the only thing that is good without qualification. A good will is one that acts from duty, that is, from respect for the moral law itself rather than from inclination, self-interest, or fear of consequences. Kant draws a careful distinction between acting from duty and acting merely in accordance with duty: a shopkeeper who charges fair prices only to avoid lost customers acts in accordance with duty but lacks moral worth, whereas one who charges fair prices because doing so is right acts from duty and possesses genuine moral worth. For Kant, duty (Pflicht in German) represents the necessity of acting from reverence for the moral law, and only actions performed from such reverence have true moral value. This duty-centered approach has shaped not only ethical theory but also discussions of rights, justice, and political legitimacy.

All chapters
  1. 1Foundations of Utilitarianism
  2. 2Deontology and Kantian Ethics
  3. 3Virtue Ethics and the Good Life
  4. 4Meta-Ethics, Relativism, and Moral Foundations
  5. 5Social Contract Theory and Theories of Justice
  6. 6Applied Ethics in Medicine and Technology
  7. 7Environmental Ethics and Animal Rights

Drill it

Reading is not remembering. These come from the Ethics And Moral Philosophy deck:

Q

What is utilitarianism?

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory stating that the best action is the one that maximizes overall utility, typically defined as happiness or well-being for the...

Q

Who is considered the founder of classical utilitarianism?

Jeremy Bentham is considered the founder of classical utilitarianism, introducing the principle of utility in his work An Introduction to the Principles of Mora...

Q

What is the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism?

Act utilitarianism evaluates each individual action by its consequences, while rule utilitarianism evaluates actions based on whether they follow rules that gen...

Q

What is Bentham's felicific calculus?

The felicific calculus (or hedonic calculus) is Bentham's method for measuring pleasure and pain using criteria such as intensity, duration, certainty, propinqu...